Letter from Theodore Roosevelt to James Rudolph Garfield
Collection
Library of Congress Manuscript Division
Creation Date
1917-05-08
Creator(s)
Roosevelt, Theodore, 1858-1919
Your TR Source
Library of Congress Manuscript Division
1917-05-08
Roosevelt, Theodore, 1858-1919
Library of Congress Manuscript Division
1916-09-28
Roosevelt, Theodore, 1858-1919
Library of Congress Manuscript Division
1916-01-11
Roosevelt, Theodore, 1858-1919
Library of Congress Manuscript Division
1914-07-31
Roosevelt, Theodore, 1858-1919
Theodore Roosevelt believes that the Progressives “fought the good fight” and have nothing to regret.
Library of Congress Manuscript Division
1912-11-08
Theodore Roosevelt will do as Alexander H. Martin suggests. Roosevelt then inquires into an allegation that Ohio Progressives have endorsed the Republicans in Toledo and the Democratic opponents of Congressman Taylor. Roosevelt is concerned because he does not want Congressman Longworth to think Roosevelt is discriminating against him.
Library of Congress Manuscript Division
1912-08-28
On behalf of Theodore Roosevelt, Theodore Roosevelt’s secretary sends James Rudolph Garfield a letter from M. A. Williams of New York, New York. Garfield should follow the suggestions outlined in the letter as they relate to Mr. Williams’s brother, Bishop Charles D. Williams of Michigan.
Library of Congress Manuscript Division
1912-07-19
Theodore Roosevelt would like to meet with James Rudolph Garfield on Friday at the Outlook office.
Library of Congress Manuscript Division
1912-06-04
Theodore Roosevelt forwards a letter from B. B. Buckley. Roosevelt asks James Rudolph Garfield to consider Buckley’s suggestions.
Library of Congress Manuscript Division
1912-05-07
Theodore Roosevelt expresses his satisfaction with the work of James Rudolph Garfield.
Library of Congress Manuscript Division
1912-04-30
Theodore Roosevelt instructs James Rudolph Garfield not to act any further. He now hopes and wishes that for his comfort, President William H. Taft, Robert M. La Follette, or a third party will develop such an “overwhelming strength” that there will not be a tendency to come to him.
Library of Congress Manuscript Division
1911-12-01
Theodore Roosevelt felt uncomfortable by that action. He hopes James Rudolph Garfield will explain to the leaders of the Senator Robert La Follette supporters and men like Gilson Gardner and Ray Stannard Baker that none of his friends had anything to do with starting the sudden expression in his favor. It was also not a move against La Follette.
Library of Congress Manuscript Division
1911-11-24
Theodore Roosevelt advises James R. Garfield to write a “very strong categorical denial” of the marked part of the enclosure.
Library of Congress Manuscript Division
1911-11-21
Theodore Roosevelt’s secretary informs James R. Garfield that Roosevelt will be at his office on Friday from 10:30 to 1 o’clock.
Library of Congress Manuscript Division
1911-11-14
Theodore Roosevelt is concerned that James Rudolph Garfield is not part of the Ohio Constitutional Convention as it makes a great difference in “the cause of decency.” He comments that the insolence of the reactionary plutocracy has started a revulsion that helps the Socialist cause and gives the progressive leadership to the radicals.
Library of Congress Manuscript Division
1911-11-10
Theodore Roosevelt was disappointed that James Rudolph Garfield was defeated for the Ohio Constitutional Convention.
Library of Congress Manuscript Division
1911-11-09
Theodore Roosevelt agrees with James Rudolph Garfield concerning the United States Steel Corporation. He finds President William H. Taft’s behavior in the matter unbecoming since he reviewed the issue several times as part of Roosevelt’s cabinet and had no concerns. Edith Kermit Carow Roosevelt is slowly recovering.
Library of Congress Manuscript Division
1911-10-31
Theodore Roosevelt informs James Rudolph Garfield that he obliges to his letter and the copy of the letter of Robert M. La Follette. Roosevelt will see Wright that same day.
Library of Congress Manuscript Division
1911-10-20